The film ”Patton” Essay Sample free essay sample

The moviePatton. a 1970 play picturing General George Patton and his actions during World War II. was directed by Franklin Shaffner and written by Francis Ford Coppola and Edmund North. It stars George C. Scott as Patton. with Karl Malden. Michael Bates and Karl Michael Vogler. It received an Academy Award for Best Picture every bit good as winning Oscars in seven other classs. including the Best Actor award to Scott. who refused to accept it. which is a manner of accepting it with more noise than usual. It has been declared ‘culturally significant’ by the Library of Congress and is now preserved in the National Film Registry. The opening scene. in which Scott. dressed as the general. delivers a stirring soliloquy while standing in forepart of an outsize American flag sets the tone for the movie. This scene has been parodied and quoted over the old ages. and is assumed by many to be historically accurate. We will write a custom essay sample on The film †Patton† Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page This movie has blurred the often-fine line between fact and fiction and is taken as fact by legion pupils of history. Patton is depicted as an egomaniac who is in ferocious competition with General Montgomery of Great Britain. an every bit egomaniacal officer of the Allied Forces. His brusque mode and deficiency of societal accomplishments gets Patton into problem with both a hostile imperativeness and the military bid. At last he pays bow to General Omar Bradley. once his subsidiary. and is given bid of the U. S. Third Army. Patton believes in reincarnation and has strong geo-political positions that frequently conflicted with U. S. Army policy. Patton drives his bid deep into Germany and is a successful and superb general. The movie. nevertheless. wages equal attending to his dark side and is a practical psychological profile of the American war Godhead who claimed to hold fought with Caesar in a former life. every bit good as keeping bid places in countless other ground forcess i n countless other centuries. The subject of the film is the glorification of war. Patton says that no 1 of all time won a war by deceasing for his state ; the manner to win a war is to do your opposition dice for his state. He so spends his screen life seeking to do that go on. Motifs trade with the struggles in Patton’s life and his apparently suicidal run. His volatile personality. while colourful and exciting to watch onscreen. is damaging to good order in any wartime ground forces. This film serves to exemplify the fact that Patton. as a film character. is entertaining. while Patton as a superior officer would hold been a small piece of snake pit. His slapping of a shell-shocked solder is depicted as testimony to his passion. but is a major blooper. if he does it for consequence. It enrages American parents who have boies in the war and costs him the bid he so severely craved. Pattonwon Academy Awards for best effects and best redaction. The visuals of this film are stupefying both in the conflict scenes every bit good as the elegant interior shootings of beautiful Italian Villa. commandeered by Allied bid. Under the auspices of cameraman Fred Koenekamp the movie is breathtaking. Its conflict scenes take up the full screen and have majesty and a pragmatism non seen today with the modern movie makers’ leaning for digitalized effects. These may be all right for word picture of events that can non really go on. such as foreign invasions. However it does non keep a taper to existent events staged by superb movie Masterss. Patton occurs in a clip when America believed in itself. It was a clip when Americans believed themselves to be morally and culturally superior to everyone else in the universe. Americans had a can-do attitude. Patton says that America has neer lost a war. He is a hero in the clip when hero-worship is in trend. Americans. during World War II saw the word in blunt black and white. there were no sunglassess of grey. Patton. the movie. capitalise on this phenomenon. successfully recapturing a spirit of the state that had non been seen in over 20 old ages. America was get downing to see that Viet Nam was non merely unwinnable. but besides possibly incorrect. This was a arresting realisation to the American people. Patton put the American mind back on path. It is an inspiring film. and has a rah-rah spirit to it. It is reported the Richard Nixon screened it at the White House instantly before he gave orders to occupy Cambodia. misleading. obfuscating facts and out-right prevarication to t he American people. Possibly the spirit of Patton gave him the enteric fortitude and the sheer saddle sore and presumption to make it. Personally I think the movie is a chef-doeuvre and a legitimate American hoarded wealth. However. the one job that I see is in the glory of war. I believe in the thought behind the quotation mark attributed to Georges Clemenceau. ‘War is much excessively serious a affair to be entrusted to military work forces. ’ I think that monster films are all right. but we do non believe in monsters. However. we do believe in war. and its glory can turn out unsafe to a free society. I am non a pacificist and I believe in contending for one’s household and national individuality. What I am stating is that it is unsafe to do sufferer and while it is merely natural to be thankful to a military which keeps us free. immature people should see that work forces such as George Patton are non Gods. but simply retainers of a free people. and must be capable to strong civilian inadvertence. This is non covered good plenty in Patton for my gustatory sensation. Plants Cited Patton. Director Frank Shaffner. Performers George C. Scott. Karl Malden. Michael Bates and Karl Michael Vogler. 1970

Free Essays on The Tide Rises, The Tide Falls

that no one has ever heard of. I know that this partly because this was written many, many years ago and some people probably understood this, but not all because not everyone was as educated as he was or even as we are today and it confused me the first time I read it. That I can underst... Free Essays on The Tide Rises, The Tide Falls Free Essays on The Tide Rises, The Tide Falls The Tide Rises, The Tide Falls By Henry Wadsworth Longfellow The poem â€Å"The Tide Rises, The Tide Falls† written by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow is a very well written poem. Longfellow is known to be one of the best authors of all time; but this poem has its good points and it’s bad points. Some of the good points are the very even rhythms he uses, also the way he describes the travelers â€Å"life†. But in my opinion this poem also has some fairly large flaws. Some of the flaws are the fact that at the end of the poem Longfellow jumps to talking about horses, also he uses so words that no one knows what they are. Longfellow does a very good job of keeping the rhythm in this poem. In each line he makes it rhyme with the last. By doing this he makes the poem flow very nicely and makes it sound very nice. I think that is part of what makes this poem. Another thing that is very good about this poem is the way Longfellow relates the â€Å"travelers† â€Å"life† to the tide. This makes it a very metaphorical poem and by doing this he puts many underlying meanings to it that make this poem much more entertaining. This is one of the few good things about this poem. One of the main things that came to mind is how Longfellow jumps from topic to topic in this poem. For example, he goes from talking about the traveler to talking about how there are horses stamping and neighing and about the hostler. To me this kind of confused me because I was expecting to here more about the traveler but instead I get horses. This kind of irritates me. The last thing that I will complain about today is the fact that he uses language that confuses people and words that no one has ever heard of. I know that this partly because this was written many, many years ago and some people probably understood this, but not all because not everyone was as educated as he was or even as we are today and it confused me the first time I read it. That I can underst...

American Literature - compare and contrast one or two of Emily Essay

American Literature - compare and contrast one or two of Emily Dickinsons poems about death to Thanatopsis by William Cullen B - Essay Example She also suggests the cycles of life as they ride together in a carriage looking at the school full of children. She also makes reference to the growth of grain, providing more evidence of the cycle of life. In comparing the poems written by Bryant and Dickinson, one can see two different concepts of death as they are framed similarly. The poem Thanatopsis by William Cullen Bryant personifies nature in the first section of the work. Similarly to Dickinson, Bryant creates a pattern of speaking about nature that suggests that she is a female entity, He states â€Å"To Him who in the love of nature holds/Communion with her visible forms, she speaks/ a various language† (Bryant lines 1-3). This suggests that the concept of nature has an intent, a driven purpose that is founded in a sentient being that makes choices about what will and what will not happen. In this, there is a will to what happens, a sense that there is a higher purpose and meaning. This is a common theme within th e human discourse about elements of life that have no independent thought but hold power over the course of life. Nature has a power that must be dealt with and in personifying it, that power is contained with meaning and purpose that is necessary to explain the tragedies that occur. Dickinson does the same thing with death, giving it an intent through personification and creating a meaning through which the application of death is made. She states in her opening lines â€Å"Because I could not stop for Death/He kindly stopped for me† (Dickinson Lines 1-2). If death is someone who is a friend, then what he does is done with reason, the sorrow felt lessoned because clearly there was a reason that death comes to enact his purpose. Personification provides solace so that meaning and intent are provided through sentient purposes of those powers that are greater than mankind can control. Both death and nature fall into this category. Bryant, however, discusses death without person ification, but as an extension of nature. He imbues in the dead a power that coincides, at the least, with nature. He states â€Å"Old Oceans gray and melancholy waste - /Are but the solemn decorations all/Of the great tomb of man† (Bryant lines 43-45). In this, he is suggesting that not only is nature a woman, but her purpose is to provide a place of rest for the dying human beings that are not a part of her, but are the monarchy of the space. While he does not put her in thrall to humans, he does suggest that humans reign over the space in which she exists. He states â€Å"In their sleep - the dead reign there alone† (Bryant line 47). This gives them a power over the space of death, planted within the Earthly sphere of existence. The language of Bryant’s poem is not broken evenly into stanzas, but is designed with one long stanza that makes his argument about death, and a shorter, nine line stanza that brings his point across. He suggests that one should live life fully and take advantage of all that it has to offer, so that when death comes one is ready to rest. He does not say, but suggests that life is one chance of experience, and when the time comes to leave, it should not be with regret for the chains that have held one back, but for the way in which life has been lived to its fullest. Death should be at a time of readiness. Dickinson divides her poem into six, four line stanzas that are done in such a way to make a statement of thought within each verse. The poem has no rhyming, as the